Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:54 pm
- Has thanked: 57 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
I've been giving some thought to interconnects recently due to the need to extend a captive interconnect on my turntable. Googling quickly led me to ascertain that there were very few off the shelf interconnect extension options out there and custom ones could be quite expensive. Further 'homework' seemed to establish that one of the most important considerations was low capacitance. Mark Grant offers an interconnect which he makes up with low capacitance Van damme instrument cable at a very reasonable price. This led me to a bespoke instrument cable maker who frequents one of the bass players forums I subscribe to, who took on the challenge of making up the interconnect cables I required and recommended an even lower capacitance cable - Sommer LLX. The Van damme cable is <90 pF/m and the cable my guy is using is <52 pF/m. The question therefore is this - what do we consider LOW capacitance and what other considerations make the esoteric £00's+ cables 'better' than my <52 pF/m bespoke cables? What am I missing in other words?
-
- Posts: 8586
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:16 am
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 399 times
Re: Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
We don't, we buy nva, perhaps it's a question for other fora
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:54 pm
- Has thanked: 57 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
Re: Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
And there was me thinking this might be an appropriate question for the 'General Audio' forum on this site! Dear God, you;re not going to make me post in PFM are you?Daniel Quinn wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:36 am We don't, we buy nva, perhaps it's a question for other fora
- Dr Bunsen Honeydew
- Posts: 30758
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:26 pm
- Location: Muppet Labs
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
I think what DQ means is specifications are only a small part of the story, your music and your ears are the important bit.
In my case the need for low cap cables led me to listen to loads of them starting over 30 years ago. I think I have probably listened to all types now, especially all the RG (military spec) ones. Result - specs just point you in the right direction to start your work, subjective choice and how to use them are far more important.
In my case the need for low cap cables led me to listen to loads of them starting over 30 years ago. I think I have probably listened to all types now, especially all the RG (military spec) ones. Result - specs just point you in the right direction to start your work, subjective choice and how to use them are far more important.
-
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:47 pm
- Location: East Staffordshire
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
Cables = minefield. It's not all about capacitance, although that is important. Shielding, solid core vs. stranded, inductance, geometry all play a part. The cable market is awash with overpriced items with over-hyped marketing speak.
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:54 pm
- Has thanked: 57 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
Re: Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
Doc, in terms of capacitance - appreciating this is only a small part of the picture (well, sound) - is 52pF/m or less 'low'? I've no reference point at all. It's obviously lower than the Van damme cable I mentioned but is it low when compared to other cables also?Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:29 am In my case the need for low cap cables led me to listen to loads of them starting over 30 years ago. I think I have probably listened to all types now, especially all the RG (military spec) ones. Result - specs just point you in the right direction to start your work, subjective choice and how to use them are far more important.
- Dr Bunsen Honeydew
- Posts: 30758
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:26 pm
- Location: Muppet Labs
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 48 times
-
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:47 pm
- Location: East Staffordshire
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
According to some sources: 100pF/m = quite high; 70pF/m = middling, 40pF/m = very low.
-
- Posts: 4185
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:53 am
- Location: The end of the road in Suffolk Coastal.
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
In my experience it only seems to matter in extremis - i.e. very long interconnects with a passive preamp or one or two very fussy older design mm type pickups. With cables of around 1 to 2 metres, a 100pF/m cable is just fine I believe, so please don't worry about it...
Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way...The time has gone, The song is over, Thought I'd something more to say...
-
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:47 pm
- Location: East Staffordshire
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Interconnects - capacitance and other considerations
FWIW, Graham Slee suggests you need a total of 100pF between cartridge and phono input. As a guide he also suggests you assume 25pF for the arm's internal wiring, needing you to find 75pF worth of capacitance - either shorter length of higher cap cable or longer length of lower cap cable. If you are talking about cable extensions, you need to know the capacitance of your existing cartridge to plug setup. That is of course if what I've said is not a load of