What is (or is not) Ad-hominem.

[joe]

Now i know you are marco . Round does of course not mean perfectly circular . An oblate spheroid and round are not different descriptions , they are just different ways of saying the same thing , one being more nuannced and technical .

Told you , the trick is to spot the fact .

I dunno. Most people would agree that a football is round, but would they say that about a rugby ball?

[bunsen burner]

Now i know you are marco . Round does of course not mean perfectly circular . An oblate spheroid and round are not different descriptions , they are just different ways of saying the same thing , one being more nuannced and technical .

Told you , the trick is to spot the fact .

So, are you suggesting that a football, and rugby ball are both round ?

[jammy395]

Now i know you are marco. (DQ)



Dan that is one serious accusation - I do hope you know what your saying...!!!
OK BB is has proved to be a bit of a Dick on umpteen occasions, But to liken him unto the "One God" ...........

[Daniel Quinn]

a rugby ball is of course oval , the earth isnt . It is round . Fact .

[bunsen burner]

Now i know you are marco . Round does of course not mean perfectly circular . An oblate spheroid and round are not different descriptions , they are just different ways of saying the same thing , one being more nuannced and technical .

Told you , the trick is to spot the fact .

So, are you suggesting that a football, and rugby ball are both round ?

EDIT. I posted before I'd read the above post, but like minds ?

[bunsen burner]

a rugby ball is of course oval , the earth isnt .

I think you are choosing a definition of round to suit your point of view.

So if the Earth is not "perfectly round" , is it in FACT, really round at all, or possibly nearly round, or roundish ?

[Daniel Quinn]

Judgement for DQ .

Indemnity costs order again Bunsen Burner for being a vexatious litigant and wasting the courts time pursuant of arguments without substance capable of summary dismissal and upon the fact of being proven wrong .

permission to appeal denied .

Deletion of thread ordered forthwith .

[bunsen burner]

Judgement for DQ .

Indemnity costs order again Bunsen Burner for being a vexatious litigant and wasting the courts time pursuant of arguments without substance capable of summary dismissals and upon the fact of being proven wrong .

permission to appeal denied .

Which means (I think) that you have agreed (without saying) I was right.

I'm sure that in your day job the precise meaning of words, and factual information is paramount.

I rest my case.

[Dr Bunsen Honeydew]

Oh FFS this has been discussed and described in the archive so many times it is daft. This is just more bunsen burner game playing. Do your own bloody work and use the search box for the archive. But NO this is not about finding an answer this is about your ferkin' game playing. AND to put it bluntly I have had enough of it. I really cannot be bothered to wait for weeks or months of your games before the inevitable booting. SO ONE MORE EXAMPLE AND YOU ARE GONE!

[bunsen burner]

I thought the discussion about "what is a fact" was quite interesting.