Page 22 of 26

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:11 pm
by guydarryl
jammy395 wrote:Aye, on second thoughts, you may well be right Guy.......... :guiness;
cheers my dear mammy :guiness;

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:37 pm
by jammy395
guy wrote:
jammy395 wrote:Aye, on second thoughts, you may well be right Guy.......... :guiness;
cheers my dear mammy :guiness;
FFS........Shhhhhh. ;) :guiness;

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:54 pm
by jammy395
Too late it seems like ive been knobbled....... :doh: :lol:
Not banned, but cant post or search.

http://hddaudio.net/bb/viewtopic.php?id=11050&p=5

Apparently im an irritating Troll & an odious creature with a permanent misery chip. :evil:
You try and add a smidgen of truth and ballance and thats the thanks ya get.

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:20 pm
by Dr Bunsen Honeydew
It shows they are watching what is being said here like Hawks.

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:22 pm
by CN211276
Although it did not appear so at the outset, this appears to be a blatant and not very subtle case of one online speaker manufacturer/distributer attempting to tarnish the reputation of a market rival, using Darius (not the sharpest in the box) as its tool. From the evidence of the threads on this forum and the one on What Hi-Fi, this should be apparent to anyone with half a brain. Had a sharper more articulate tool taken up the gauntlet AVI might have been more successful in running down the Cubes.

The fact that the NVA equipment was damaged adds further credence to this and Darius should have to pay for the repairs.

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:31 pm
by CN211276
jammy395 wrote:Too late it seems like ive been knobbled....... :doh: :lol:
Not banned, but cant post or search.

http://hddaudio.net/bb/viewtopic.php?id=11050&p=5

Apparently im an irritating Troll & an odious creature with a permanent misery chip. :evil:
You try and add a smidgen of truth and ballance and thats the thanks ya get.
The statement that this forum is made up of "Flat Earthers" amused me.

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:05 pm
by SteveTheShadow
"Flat Earthers"
Now that's the funniest thing I've read in a long time. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 3:45 pm
by _D_S_J_R_
Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote:It shows they are watching what is being said here like Hawks.
I thought I told you that when we last got together...
CN211276 wrote: AVI might have been more successful in running down the Cubes.
In the interests of fairness, it's NOT AVI that is running down the Cubes as I don't believe either of the current directors post on HDD, let alone anywhere else - and no, I haven't ventured there to read what's been said.

I mean, NVA and AVI should be on the same side, even if from polar opposites. Neither 'company' cares one jot for BBC-style passive speakers in original or current descended form and one positively and loudly loathes every speaker ever made with a passive crossover.

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 4:06 pm
by Dr Bunsen Honeydew
I would happily be on the side of AVi once they finally get rid of arse mouth and his sidekick JC. They are pollutants on the industry. As I said I see they have a market and customer base, maybe an even bigger one than us enthusiasts, but there needs to be mutual respect that at the moment doesn't exist.

I am sure the designer and his new partner want to make a new start away from arse mouth, and I detect he may at last be getting some stick from them. If that had been the status quo now then none of this nonsense would have happened.

Re: AVI vs...? bake off anyone?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 5:32 pm
by Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Well Darius is just getting nastier and nastier on WHF, The latest is Cube 2s are like a Panasonic boom box cut in half. :lol:

There is a clue being missed, I accused, as a maybe, that he got his badly marked AVi speakers sorted and maybe even other *considerations* in exchange for this nonsense. Now if I was accused of this even as a maybe I would have been back like a shot defending my position. If I had played games then I would ignore it and hope it goes away - in there lies a tale :think:

I am certain there is more to this than meets the eye otherwise the escalation wouldn't have happened. He didn't like them, so bloody what, I got my bad review I thought the review thread needed. I don't think I stimulated any of this. Darius then in his Feckin' stupidity went out of his way to wind up Jammy and DQ (not a good idea), Neil responded with anger at the state of the stuff when he got it, and it all went pear shaped from that point.

The man has decided he wants to fight us, bad decision, he is not clever enough, we can take him apart very easily, the ground he is standing is extremely unstable both in truth and reality, but he doesn't seem to see it.