HiFi Subjectivist ¦ Audio Forum ¦ NVA User Group

The alternative is anarchy....

Agreed!

But there would still be need of One Rule: Do not behave in any way, so we need to make up another rule.

Moderation by self-responsibility tacitly supported by collective agreement.

There is no authority but yourself...

And there you have debate again, it all goes around in a circle i.e. the logical fallacy of circular argument (circulus in demonstrando)

Blame the Ancient Greeks, they started creating the rules in order to bring society out of anarchy. Or in fact to create society.

Lotus Seven S wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:10 pm Compromise is always a DEAL - something for something - a win/win situation - and never the result of logical argument.

I agree, in my experience. But logic can be applied to the practical consequences of emotions and vested interests in order to achieve a deal.

savvypaul wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:28 pm There is no authority but yourself...

...and no-one else to blame.

Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:14 pm The alternative is anarchy. I must admit I am a bit of an anarchist. I think we have gone too far, a bit of anarchy now and then does us good, it opens possibilities and alternatives.

Anarchy, to me, means that everyone takes responsibility for their own actions and the consequences to others. It also involves doing something about the things we won't tolerate rather than just accepting...believing that our lives can be better

Anarchy is selfish and idiotic

Daniel Quinn wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:02 pm Anarchy is selfish and idiotic

Not my version

Anarchy doesn't prohibit cooperation, quite the opposite

Consensual anarchy does'nt exsist

DQ you call yourself a communist, yet if you went to a commune here in the UK (Israel is different) just about to a person they would call themselves anarchists, are they wrong to do that.