Poundland Amp Project

A place for DIY project discussions.
User avatar
SteveTheShadow
Posts: 1646
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:24 pm
Has thanked: 272 times
Been thanked: 339 times
Great Britain

Re: Poundland Amp Project

Unread post by SteveTheShadow »

Geoff.R.G wrote: Mon Jul 05, 2021 7:32 am It looks amazing but, as an engineer, I think the output transformer on the right should be slightly closer to the edge so that it’s centre line coincides with that of the valve in front of it.
The valves have to be the width of 1.5 envelopes apart so they can’t go any closer to each other than they are, otherwise they will heat each other by radiation. Then there is the small double triode at the front to think about. It can’t go any further forward or its socket would foul the lamp or any further towards the power valves due to heating by radiation. The valves are equally offset from each of their respective output transformers.

The problem you are seeing on the photograph, is a much bigger one: the controls are offset to the right from the three valves. IMO it was an unforgivable error on my part, and was so easily avoidable given a bit of forethought and some old fashioned ‘measure twice, cut once’ policy. I suspected that somebody would notice it eventually, but what’s done is done and I’m just going to have to suck it up I’m afraid, because there is no way I’ll be rebuilding for the sake of three slightly misplaced control mountings. Let’s just call it a lovable quirk. :-?
Somebody’s telling me the latest scandals.
Somebody’s stepping on my plastic sandals. Joe Jackson (1979)

Geoff.R.G
Posts: 1562
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 2:46 pm
Location: Denham UK
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 476 times
Great Britain

Re: Poundland Amp Project

Unread post by Geoff.R.G »

SteveTheShadow wrote: Mon Jul 05, 2021 8:41 am
Geoff.R.G wrote: Mon Jul 05, 2021 7:32 am It looks amazing but, as an engineer, I think the output transformer on the right should be slightly closer to the edge so that it’s centre line coincides with that of the valve in front of it.
The valves have to be the width of 1.5 envelopes apart so they can’t go any closer to each other than they are, otherwise they will heat each other by radiation. Then there is the small double triode at the front to think about. It can’t go any further forward or its socket would foul the lamp or any further towards the power valves due to heating by radiation. The valves are equally offset from each of their respective output transformers.

The problem you are seeing on the photograph, is a much bigger one: the controls are offset to the right from the three valves. IMO it was an unforgivable error on my part, and was so easily avoidable given a bit of forethought and some old fashioned ‘measure twice, cut once’ policy. I suspected that somebody would notice it eventually, but what’s done is done and I’m just going to have to suck it up I’m afraid, because there is no way I’ll be rebuilding for the sake of three slightly misplaced control mountings. Let’s just call it a lovable quirk. :-?
I'd missed that the controls weren't in line but I probably reasoned that it was deliberate to avoid the valve bases. It still looks good and most people wouldn't notice.

User avatar
CycleCoach
Posts: 1072
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:20 pm
Location: Kings Cliffe
Has thanked: 1739 times
Been thanked: 677 times
EUROPEAN_UNION

Re: Poundland Amp Project

Unread post by CycleCoach »

Looks pretty good to me.
I think I might be in the HiFi trade.
I am not currently seeking treatment for this.
Current System: Linn LP12 Lingo Ekos Troika, NVA PHONO2 with BBPSU, NVA AP20 (White), Quad ESL 57s &/or NVA Cube3s (White)

User avatar
SteveTheShadow
Posts: 1646
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:24 pm
Has thanked: 272 times
Been thanked: 339 times
Great Britain

Re: Poundland Amp Project

Unread post by SteveTheShadow »

F9ABFB4E-7256-4605-8A16-AEB48EA5890C.jpeg
F9ABFB4E-7256-4605-8A16-AEB48EA5890C.jpeg (111.39 KiB) Viewed 1055 times
Baseboard and feet fitted after changing resistor in power supply. Job done.
These users thanked the author SteveTheShadow for the post (total 4):
karatestu (Mon Jul 05, 2021 2:51 pm) • slinger (Mon Jul 05, 2021 2:57 pm) • Firebug1 (Mon Jul 05, 2021 5:21 pm) • CycleCoach (Tue Jul 06, 2021 10:58 am)
Somebody’s telling me the latest scandals.
Somebody’s stepping on my plastic sandals. Joe Jackson (1979)

antonio66
Posts: 1006
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2019 8:16 am
Location: Grimsby/Phnom Penh
Has thanked: 1449 times
Been thanked: 408 times
Great Britain

Re: Poundland Amp Project

Unread post by antonio66 »

antonio66 wrote: Mon Jul 05, 2021 2:12 am And looking very nice Steve, my only niggle would be the red, presumably on/off switch. The base board, what will go underneath it and what will go between the amp and baseboard?
Mis-understanding by me, thought you meant a separate base board for it to stand on, and seeing the amp at a better angle I realise it's the on/off light.

User avatar
SteveTheShadow
Posts: 1646
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:24 pm
Has thanked: 272 times
Been thanked: 339 times
Great Britain

Re: Poundland Amp Project

Unread post by SteveTheShadow »

From the AT forum.
Cressy Snr wrote: Sun Jul 04, 2021 10:22 pm
… the physical layout of the two 45s and the single ECC88 driver stage, means it is completely impossible to mess with; there simply isn’t the room. I took a conscious decision with this amp to deliberately make it difficult, if not impossible to modify. There can be no alternative drivers apart from those in the ECC88 family. There can be no octal driver substitutions, no room. There can be no DC modules for the 45 filaments, no room. No HT regulators: solid state or otherwise, no room. No fancy stepped attenuator, no room. The amp is basic, is what it is and is forced by its small size to remain so, which is good.
Well I didn’t bargain for the scope that a 5V rectifier on an octal socket scheme would give for endless plugging and unplugging. :naughty:
Anyway I’ve taken the initiative, and shut down that particular avenue good and proper, with the aid of a British B5 valve socket and 0.47R power resistor to give near as dammit a 4V/2A rectifier spec.
The 4V transformer I have is too big to fit, which is actually a good thing, because the 0R47 resistor in series with the 5V transformer secondary means only 4V/2A spec unless the resistor is changed. The resulting inconvenience stops any chance of me even thinking about classic Mullard FW4-500 rectifiers and their 3A ilk.
My sole Mazda UU4 is now in residence in the rectifier position. It is the only 4V, full wave rectifier valve I have. Fecking about is now shut down on all fronts.
E5CEF4A3-5E60-4373-A583-BA995EE197BD.jpeg
E5CEF4A3-5E60-4373-A583-BA995EE197BD.jpeg (90.13 KiB) Viewed 876 times
Peace. Perfect peace.
These users thanked the author SteveTheShadow for the post:
slinger (Wed Jul 14, 2021 6:31 pm)
Somebody’s telling me the latest scandals.
Somebody’s stepping on my plastic sandals. Joe Jackson (1979)

Post Reply