The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
- savvypaul
- Posts: 8743
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 7:14 pm
- Location: Durham
- Has thanked: 1668 times
- Been thanked: 3034 times
- Contact:
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
This is one of those situations where you can make the figures say whatever suits your point of view..
There are so many caveats
There are so many caveats
- CN211276
- Posts: 6566
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:29 am
- Location: Cardiff
- Has thanked: 1438 times
- Been thanked: 992 times
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
However the figures are interpreted, there can be no doubt that thousands of deaths would have been prevented had the lockdowns been sooner. Allowing Cheltenham to go ahead in March 2000 was madness. Football authorities took matters into their own hands by cancelling fixtures before lock down. Because the lockdowns were implemented too late they went on for longer than would otherwise have been the case. Made no. difference to No. 10 though.
Main System
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
- savvypaul
- Posts: 8743
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 7:14 pm
- Location: Durham
- Has thanked: 1668 times
- Been thanked: 3034 times
- Contact:
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
There is a non political discussion of the figures on R4, right now.
The programme is called More or Less
The programme is called More or Less
-
- Posts: 1569
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 2:46 pm
- Location: Denham UK
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
Unfortunately, without knowing the percentage of the 150,000 had pre-existing, potentially terminal, conditions it is impossible to say how many of them would have died of the pre-existing condition irrespective of the positive test.CN211276 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:50 am However the figures are interpreted, there can be no doubt that thousands of deaths would have been prevented had the lockdowns been sooner. Allowing Cheltenham to go ahead in March 2000 was madness. Football authorities took matters into their own hands by cancelling fixtures before lock down. Because the lockdowns were implemented too late they went on for longer than would otherwise have been the case. Made no. difference to No. 10 though.
Lockdowns were implemented on the basis of modelling. The decision of the cabinet in December 2021 not to follow the “science”, by not implementing more onerous restrictions, allowed the predictions of several models to be tested. The data shows that the models massively overestimated the numbers of hospital admissions and deaths. It is more than likely that previous modelling and predictions were equally erroneous.
- savvypaul
- Posts: 8743
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 7:14 pm
- Location: Durham
- Has thanked: 1668 times
- Been thanked: 3034 times
- Contact:
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
Different variant. Not directly comparable. But more than likely that the later models were more advanced as more relevant data was available. Nonetheless, Johnson took a big gamble by letting it play out with minimal restrictions, given the very high number of daily infections. Luckily, Omicron has proven to be a lot less severe than previous variants.Geoff.R.G wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:43 amUnfortunately, without knowing the percentage of the 150,000 had pre-existing, potentially terminal, conditions it is impossible to say how many of them would have died of the pre-existing condition irrespective of the positive test.CN211276 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:50 am However the figures are interpreted, there can be no doubt that thousands of deaths would have been prevented had the lockdowns been sooner. Allowing Cheltenham to go ahead in March 2000 was madness. Football authorities took matters into their own hands by cancelling fixtures before lock down. Because the lockdowns were implemented too late they went on for longer than would otherwise have been the case. Made no. difference to No. 10 though.
Lockdowns were implemented on the basis of modelling. The decision of the cabinet in December 2021 not to follow the “science”, by not implementing more onerous restrictions, allowed the predictions of several models to be tested. The data shows that the models massively overestimated the numbers of hospital admissions and deaths. It is more than likely that previous modelling and predictions were equally erroneous.
The More or Less programme was discussing your first point, but I didn't hear all of it, so I will catch up on iplayer, some time.
-
- Posts: 1569
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 2:46 pm
- Location: Denham UK
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
Omicron is easier to catch but has markedly less severe symptoms. Thus as earlier variants were not as easy to catch it isn't possible to directly compare the predictions. However, as the models were based on minimal data, it is likely that they were pessimistic, for obvious reasons. The predictions for July 2021 and September 2021 seriously exaggerated the numbers too, and that was Delta. If, as so many have suggested, we had "trusted the science" we would have remained in lock down or under more onerous restrictions for considerably longer than was actually the case.savvypaul wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:02 pmDifferent variant. Not directly comparable. But more than likely that the later models were more advanced as more relevant data was available. Nonetheless, Johnson took a big gamble by letting it play out with minimal restrictions, given the very high number of daily infections. Luckily, Omicron has proven to be a lot less severe than previous variants.Geoff.R.G wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:43 amUnfortunately, without knowing the percentage of the 150,000 had pre-existing, potentially terminal, conditions it is impossible to say how many of them would have died of the pre-existing condition irrespective of the positive test.CN211276 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:50 am However the figures are interpreted, there can be no doubt that thousands of deaths would have been prevented had the lockdowns been sooner. Allowing Cheltenham to go ahead in March 2000 was madness. Football authorities took matters into their own hands by cancelling fixtures before lock down. Because the lockdowns were implemented too late they went on for longer than would otherwise have been the case. Made no. difference to No. 10 though.
Lockdowns were implemented on the basis of modelling. The decision of the cabinet in December 2021 not to follow the “science”, by not implementing more onerous restrictions, allowed the predictions of several models to be tested. The data shows that the models massively overestimated the numbers of hospital admissions and deaths. It is more than likely that previous modelling and predictions were equally erroneous.
The More or Less programme was discussing your first point, but I didn't hear all of it, so I will catch up on iplayer, some time.
- CN211276
- Posts: 6566
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:29 am
- Location: Cardiff
- Has thanked: 1438 times
- Been thanked: 992 times
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
[quote=Geoff.R.G post_id=226807 time=1643196416 user_id= If, as so many have suggested, we had "trusted the science" we would have remained in lock down or under more onerous restrictions for considerably longer than was actually the case.
[/quote
and more government lies. If restrictions and lockdowns were more timely they would not have needed to go on for so long.
[/quote
and more government lies. If restrictions and lockdowns were more timely they would not have needed to go on for so long.
Main System
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
- savvypaul
- Posts: 8743
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 7:14 pm
- Location: Durham
- Has thanked: 1668 times
- Been thanked: 3034 times
- Contact:
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
There were a range of models and, therefore, a range of possible outcomes. Seems to me that you are being rather selective with your hindsight.Geoff.R.G wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:26 pmOmicron is easier to catch but has markedly less severe symptoms. Thus as earlier variants were not as easy to catch it isn't possible to directly compare the predictions. However, as the models were based on minimal data, it is likely that they were pessimistic, for obvious reasons. The predictions for July 2021 and September 2021 seriously exaggerated the numbers too, and that was Delta. If, as so many have suggested, we had "trusted the science" we would have remained in lock down or under more onerous restrictions for considerably longer than was actually the case.savvypaul wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:02 pmDifferent variant. Not directly comparable. But more than likely that the later models were more advanced as more relevant data was available. Nonetheless, Johnson took a big gamble by letting it play out with minimal restrictions, given the very high number of daily infections. Luckily, Omicron has proven to be a lot less severe than previous variants.Geoff.R.G wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:43 am
Unfortunately, without knowing the percentage of the 150,000 had pre-existing, potentially terminal, conditions it is impossible to say how many of them would have died of the pre-existing condition irrespective of the positive test.
Lockdowns were implemented on the basis of modelling. The decision of the cabinet in December 2021 not to follow the “science”, by not implementing more onerous restrictions, allowed the predictions of several models to be tested. The data shows that the models massively overestimated the numbers of hospital admissions and deaths. It is more than likely that previous modelling and predictions were equally erroneous.
The More or Less programme was discussing your first point, but I didn't hear all of it, so I will catch up on iplayer, some time.
The topic in this thread is Johnson. Seems to me that he was slow to lockdown in early 2020, slow to take action in September 2020 (more deaths in the second wave than the first) despite the lessons from earlier and with no vaccine in sight at that stage, and took a massive gamble (because he had run out of political capital with his backbenchers) in Xmas 2021 on a highly infectious variant that they did not know for certain was less severe.
Vaccine roll out is an undoubted success, but Johnson has failed (along with most other world leaders) to work on the international stage to vaccinate in less developed countries. Which is why we remain especially open to more variants, and our existing vaccines are not guaranteed to work on them.
-
- Posts: 1569
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 2:46 pm
- Location: Denham UK
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
Actually the truth was that there were fewer deaths and hospitalisations in July and September 21 than the most optimistic model, likewise in December. South African data suggested early on that Omicron was less severe than previous variants and the UK Chief Medical Officer had predicted that this is what would happen, he told us in 2020 but even so we weren't ready for the number of positive tests, a failing of the government under Boris. Where else he has failed is open to question in some respects but definitely he should have lead on the world stage but then neither did almost anyone else.savvypaul wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:37 pmThere were a range of models and, therefore, a range of possible outcomes. Seems to me that you are being rather selective with your hindsight.Geoff.R.G wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:26 pmOmicron is easier to catch but has markedly less severe symptoms. Thus as earlier variants were not as easy to catch it isn't possible to directly compare the predictions. However, as the models were based on minimal data, it is likely that they were pessimistic, for obvious reasons. The predictions for July 2021 and September 2021 seriously exaggerated the numbers too, and that was Delta. If, as so many have suggested, we had "trusted the science" we would have remained in lock down or under more onerous restrictions for considerably longer than was actually the case.savvypaul wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:02 pm
Different variant. Not directly comparable. But more than likely that the later models were more advanced as more relevant data was available. Nonetheless, Johnson took a big gamble by letting it play out with minimal restrictions, given the very high number of daily infections. Luckily, Omicron has proven to be a lot less severe than previous variants.
The More or Less programme was discussing your first point, but I didn't hear all of it, so I will catch up on iplayer, some time.
The topic in this thread is Johnson. Seems to me that he was slow to lockdown in early 2020, slow to take action in September 2020 (more deaths in the second wave than the first) despite the lessons from earlier and with no vaccine in sight at that stage, and took a massive gamble (because he had run out of political capital with his backbenchers) in Xmas 2021 on a highly infectious variant that they did not know for certain was less severe.
Vaccine roll out is an undoubted success, but Johnson has failed (along with most other world leaders) to work on the international stage to vaccinate in less developed countries. Which is why we remain especially open to more variants, and our existing vaccines are not guaranteed to work on them.
- slinger
- Posts: 9330
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:30 pm
- Location: The Garden of England
- Has thanked: 4717 times
- Been thanked: 3178 times
Re: The Rise & Fall of Boris Johnson
It appears that the pre-release synopsis of the Sue Gray report is out, and although redacted, is readable.
Amps - NVA P50, AP30, A40, Stanislav Palo Tube Headphone Amp BB 85
Speakers - Monitor Audio Silver RX2
Cables - NVA LS1+LS3, SSC, Gotham S/PDIF, IBRA Optical
Digital - NAD C516BEE, SONY ST-SDB900 DAB TUNER, TEAC UD-H01 DAC
Analogue - Pro-Ject Debut Carbon Esprit SB, Graham Slee Gram Amp 2 Phono
Cans - Grado SR80, ATH-M50X
Speakers - Monitor Audio Silver RX2
Cables - NVA LS1+LS3, SSC, Gotham S/PDIF, IBRA Optical
Digital - NAD C516BEE, SONY ST-SDB900 DAB TUNER, TEAC UD-H01 DAC
Analogue - Pro-Ject Debut Carbon Esprit SB, Graham Slee Gram Amp 2 Phono
Cans - Grado SR80, ATH-M50X