HiFi Subjectivist ¦ Audio Forum ¦ NVA User Group

Okay Dokay, point made, IMO there is a sense of humour transplant needed, but I accept your views. Lets drop the photo thing for the mo, though one last comment from me. IF you opinions were unbiased then you would be saying the same things to Marco at AoS at his uses of my photos. BUT the difference is I love what he is doing and have had a good laugh. My swimming pic in Cuba is great, I think I look really cool and enjoying it, as I was. Hitler was great, I looked far worse without the hair I wish i had more pics to upload for him to play with.

See the difference!

A post for BOTH Proggy and Brit.

I do realise you both have split loyalties, and since you joined you have made a very good job of balance. I made the mistake of the picture piss take being published here instead of EOTW, I apologise for that. So let it go (and this applies to us DQ as well) and reset the computer to before it. No piss take has been aimed at you two.

o dear brit pops pissed off for reasons unfathomable .

" I intentionally didn't take any crowd pics this time as I didn't approve of the pisstaking from last time."

please have a go how this self contained , self referential sentence was used out of context !

Also can you explain what the H/S consensus is as I am baffled by this .

Daniel Quinn wrote:o dear brit pops pissed off for reasons unfathomable .

" I intentionally didn't take any crowd pics this time as I didn't approve of the pisstaking from last time."

please have a go how this self contained , self referential sentence was used out of context !

Also can you explain what the H/S consensus is as I am baffled by this .

Dan, it's not unfathomable. I'm pissed off with you.

You used my comment out of context by using it to justify a claim of censorship, I've said it's about not giving you ammo and stopping you having your fun.

I'm not sure what you mean re the consensus comment.

Anyway, you've been told and that's that.

I am not sure if you are understanding correctly .

but if you say
" I intentionally didn't take any crowd pics this time as I didn't approve of the pisstaking from last time."

Then that is necessarily an act of censorship .

by saying it is an act of censorship , it is impossible therefore to take your comments out of context to subvert their meaning ,it is what it is .

you should read Stuart Hall at the centre for cultural studies or the Glasgow university media group publications , the fact of self censorship in media publications is one of the most important aspects of maintaining an hegemony .

or as you like to say consensus .

Daniel Quinn wrote:I am not sure if you are understanding correctly .

but if you say
" I intentionally didn't take any crowd pics this time as I didn't approve of the pisstaking from last time."

Then that is necessarily an act of censorship .

by saying it is an act of censorship , it is impossible therefore to take your comments out of context to subvert their meaning ,it is what it is .

you should read Stuart Hall at the centre for cultural studies or the Glasgow university media group publications , the fact of self censorship in media publications is one of the most important aspects of maintaining an hegemony .

or as you like to say consensus .

Obfuscation.

Is this what death by A level sociology feels like?

Kiss and make up please. Or do I need to put up a new thread in EOTW just for you two to have a battle, I suppose it could be mildly entertaining for the rest of us.

It wouldnt . at least macca and pinky actually argued without relying on rehtoric.

All i know his he is pissed of with me for reasons i cannot comprehend.

If i used his words illegimately or out of context i will gladly apologise. But i did not.

Roll on NEBO 7............