Page 3 of 8

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:52 pm
by savvypaul
Fretless wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:44 pm
savvypaul wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:32 pm I should add that, now we nave the new NVA website, I am not averse to removing the commercial NVA content from this site.
Well I, for one, would miss that.
The commercial information would be at nvahifi.co.uk and the NVA Facebook / Instagram pages.

There would be nothing to stop discussion of NVA here, but it would not have a dedicated area, it would be in with all other brands.

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:02 pm
by Daniel Quinn
The 'It's now 50.45' posts were aimed at showing the measurements over 24 hours. It was argued that this varied significantly. I was proving it didn't.

I find it no surprise that the people moaning have a vested interest.

Finally, I fail to see lurchers point. On his own forum he doesn't have any rules. Deos he think the group consensus is better. I refer you to posts of Rd. He was forced to intervene.

It sounds to me like bleating.

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:08 pm
by valvesRus
In my humble opinion the biggest problem on this forum is the posting style of one particular person.

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:14 pm
by savvypaul
valvesRus wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:08 pm In my humble opinion the biggest problem on this forum is the posting style of one particular person.
Then, given your experience at Nick's forum, where ad hom etc are not removed, I am interested to watch how you go about building mutual consent.

For such purposes, I will allow this thread to go unmoderated, and we shall see.

:epopc:

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:30 pm
by Daniel Quinn
valvesRus wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:08 pm In my humble opinion the biggest problem on this forum is the posting style of one particular person.
I was going take advantage of this thread being unmoderated. But your moaning about me and Richard for 5 year. Go back and have a look.

I've come to the conclusion, if your moaning I'm doing something right.

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:33 pm
by valvesRus
Daniel Quinn wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:30 pm
I've come to the conclusion, if your moaning I'm doing something right.
Well then DQ, your conclusion here, as in so many of your posts, is incorrect.

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:39 pm
by Daniel Quinn
You see what you did. You just proved me right😂😂😂

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:43 pm
by savvypaul
Get stuck in and fight it out, chaps. It is the only way we (might) make progress. And it is preferable to snide remarks and snipes that are crafted to stay just within the rules.

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:45 pm
by valvesRus
Daniel Quinn wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:39 pm You see what you did. You just proved me right😂😂😂
I'm glad you think that DQ, others may not. Saying things does not make them true, however many times you might try.

If you were to stick to posting about actual experiences and not dismissing things you have no experience of you might be taken more seriously.

Re: The problem with the Ad-Hom rule on here?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:55 pm
by valvesRus
savvypaul wrote: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:43 pm Get stuck in and fight it out, chaps. It is the only way we (might) make progress. And it is preferable to snide remarks and snipes that are crafted to stay just within the rules.
This topic needs input from many others, It does not need to be just an adversarial exchange between DQ and myself.