Page 5 of 6
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 1:38 pm
by Dr Bunsen Honeydew
OK back on topic and away from the nutters Doc and Alfi
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 2:28 pm
by Macca
Alfi wrote:I Why did the BBC report building 7 as having collapsed whilst it was still standing behind the female reporter when she was live on air? Also building 7 collapsed within it's own footprint, as did the twin towers a case of controlled demolition.
Alfi.
Those things are all quite easily explained and have been. Think about it if it was a false flag operation why go to the extra trouble of flying planes into both towers? Wouldn't one have been bad enough to justify the 'War On Terror'? And why also demolish building 7? Doesn't stack up.
I agree that the Pentagon event does have some serious gaps in the narrative, though. Are we really to believe that the only video surveillance available immediately outside the Pentagon is some old stop-motion low resolution camera? I don't buy that. And it has been demonstrated pretty conclusively that even a very experienced pilot. familiar with that type of aircraft, could not fly it into the Pentagon at that angle. So I do suspect something else went on there which has been covered up but whatever it was a false flag op still makes no sense.
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 3:10 pm
by Alfi
Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote:OK back on topic and away from the nutters Doc and Alfi
I'm sure I'm a much bigger nutter than you Doc
Alfi.
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 12:35 am
by Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Maybe, mine is more about being affronted by human behaviour and nature. . My obsession, roll on genetic engineering, no more Cancer or any genetic illnesses, life expectancy over 200 years. No disabled, even from trauma, as limbs will be rebuilt. No more depression or most mental illness, and finally no more wars and nutters like this lot, as ALL religion will be viewed the same as we now view belief in fairies. Bring it on.
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 12:38 pm
by jammy395
Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote:As there are about Kennedy, Rothwell, the Bermuda Triangle,
Diana's death, and so many things it is daft.
I believe Diana was taken out by the "British Establishment", for fear she was preggers & carrying a Muslim (Dodie's) child.
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 5:59 pm
by Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Why do you believe that, do you have evidence.
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:59 pm
by jammy395
Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote:Why do you believe that, do you have evidence.
Cause I do.
Not a shred, and im quite glad of that or else.......
..................................................................................................
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:04 pm
by Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Oh dear
We should start a thread as to what wins as the most ridiculous conspiracy theory ever. The worst one I have heard is Marco and I are really the same person and I/we are doing this to get lots of attention
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:48 pm
by Daniel Quinn
Today i am amused by the corralation of the views i find most offesnsive and silly on paraisian terroism and the propensity to believe in conspiracy theories.
Re: Nutters at it again
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:52 pm
by joe
Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote:Oh dear
We should start a thread as to what wins as the most ridiculous conspiracy theory ever. The worst one I have heard is Marco and I are really the same person and I/we are doing this to get lots of attention
There was the 'McCartney is dead' one; not sure what that was all about. I seem to recall a similar theory about Dylan; that his motorbike crash was actually fatal and he was replaced by a look-alike. That actually had more feasibility given Dylan's apparent personality change and new musical direction post-crash.